Arctic Scientists in the Classroom: Principles for Designing Community-Centered Educational Programs

Arctic Scientists in the Classroom: Principles for Designing Community-Centered Educational Programs

Image
Blue color

1. Introduction

Course Overview

The best practices for science education and outreach in the Arctic has shifted dramatically over the past 30 years as “helicopter scientist” presentations to arctic classrooms have gradually been replaced by more thoughtful youth and community-centered approaches. This mini-course introduces you to principles of evidence-based, community-centered design of science outreach and education programming in the Arctic. Through concrete examples, the mini-course will demonstrate how instructional design theory and co-production of knowledge frameworks can guide and enhance outreach project development. Examples include projects from the NSF Navigating the New Arctic initiative and NASA Science Activation Arctic and Earth SIGNs project. You will leave with an outreach program planning guide incorporating the key considerations and evidence based design for their research in Arctic classrooms or communities. 

Who is this for?

Arctic researchers who want to engage students and communities in their research.

Why take this course

Take this course to explore what good design looks like in Arctic STEM education and outreach—design that centers learner and community priorities, draws on evidence-based and culturally sustaining practices, and is rooted in the core values of Relationship, Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Representation, and Responsibility.

Collaborators

Rooted in collaboration, community, and shared commitment to Arctic education.

NNA logo

Supported By

The Navigating the New Arctic Community Office (NNA-CO) resources for collaboration and knowledge exchange within, between, and beyond the research projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s NNA Initiative.

Introduction to Evidence-Based, Community-Centered Design

In this introduction video, Dr. Katie Spellman and Dr. Elena Sparrow explore how to design community- and youth-centered science education experiences for Arctic classrooms. They discuss the importance of local knowledge, the role of elders, challenges like teacher turnover and limited resources, and the need to decolonize education by aligning classroom outreach with community values and priorities. The series models backward design and provides evidence-based strategies for creating meaningful, inclusive Arctic science engagement.

Designing Your Own Community-Centered Education and Outreach Activity: Classroom Skits

In this video, Dr. Katie Spellman and Dr. Elena Sparrow compare two approaches scientists can take when visiting Arctic classrooms. Through role play, they highlight how shifting from a lecture style presentation to an interactive, community centered discussion rooted in students’ own experiences creates deeper engagement and learning. The video emphasizes the value of storytelling, collaboration, and Arctic pedagogy in designing meaningful educational experiences.

Icon of a document with horizontal lines and a magnifying glass positioned over it, symbolizing data review or document analysis.

After Watching: Take a Moment to Reflect

  • What did you notice about the approaches the first and second version of the scientist visit to an Arctic classroom?
  • Were there any other particular techniques the scientist in the second scene used to make sure that the visit centered on the students and the classroom beyond the story drawing activity?

2. How do we center learner and community priorities?

In this section...

You’ll be introduced to ways to learn about community and learner needs, assets, and priorities through pre-assessment.

test

Before You Begin: Take a Moment to Reflect

Take a moment to pause and reflect on your learning needs and priorities as you begin this course. Consider what you hope to gain, and jot down your thoughts in a notebook to help guide your journey.

Design Principles for Community-Centered Arctic STEAM Education

In this video, you will be introduced to a backwards design learning framework. Backwards design means that you start by planning the desired outcomes, and then work backwards to design the learning activities which lead towards those outcomes.  Pre-assessment is an important way to gather input on what the community needs and want from a learning experience at the beginning of the planning stage.

Explore More

Universal Backward Design is an instructional planning approach that combines the clarity and goal-orientation of Backward Design with the inclusivity of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Educators begin by identifying desired learning outcomes, then plan assessments and instructional activities that support all learners in reaching those goals. This method emphasizes proactive planning for diverse learning needs by incorporating flexible materials, varied assessment options, and multiple ways of engaging students. The goal is to create accessible, equitable learning experiences from the start, ensuring all students can succeed.

3. Evidence-based design principles

In this section...

You’ll see several Arctic learning frameworks and be able to identify key components of both Arctic and academic science design principles

Simple blue line icon of a person with a hand on their chin and a thought bubble above their head, representing thinking or contemplation.

Before You Begin: Take a Moment to Reflect

  • What values do you hold? What values do you bring to your work?
  • How will you find out the values of the place or classroom you are working with?

Frameworks for Community-Centered Arctic STEAM Education and Outreach

In this video, we explore a learning model that blends traditional Indigenous knowledge and academic science. Central to any learning experience is to first determine the values that guide the outreach activity, considering the local community values, school values, and the values that you bring as a scientist. Our suggested blended learning model starts with listening to elders, local culture bearers, scientists, and students before moving into exploration, experimentation, explaining, and ending with action.

4. Core elements of Arctic Pedagogy

In this Section...

This section explores the core principles of Arctic pedagogy and its connections to place, community, story, observation, digitalization, and more. It also highlights how the 6 Rs of co-production guide education and outreach

Black line drawing of a person with one hand on their chin and a thought bubble above their head, representing thinking or reflection.

Before You Begin: Take a Moment to Reflect

  • What do YOU think are the core elements of Arctic STEM pedagogy?
  • What are some good practices for scientists seeking to do Arctic outreach?

Core Elements of Community-Centered Arctic STEAM Education and Outreach

In this video, we share the core elements and principles of Arctic pedagogy including connection to place, community involvement, story, observation, and digitalization amongst others. We discuss how the ‘6 Rs’ of co-production research (Relationship, Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Representation, Responsibility) apply to education and outreach, too. 

Explore More

Learn more about The Globe Program.

5. Applying Arctic Pedagogy Through Community-Centered Design

In this section...

In this section we’ll see several examples of community-based outreach from the Navigating the New Arctic initiative. As you view these videos, consider what the projects did well, what were the growth areas, what elements of Arctic pedagogy were included, and what would you have done differently?

Dark blue line drawing of a person with one hand on their chin and a thought bubble above their head, representing thinking or reflection.

Before You Begin: Take a Moment to Reflect

  • What is the essential question of this outreach?
  • What are the needs and priorities of this classroom?
  • What are the values of the school?
  • What are the learning outcomes you hope to achieve? 

Designing Your Own Community-Centered Education and Outreach Activity

In this final mini-course video, Dr. Katie Spellman and Dr. Elena Sparrow show how to apply Arctic pedagogy and community-centered design through real project examples. They guide viewers in using backward design to create meaningful, culturally grounded learning experiences, emphasizing collaboration, reflection, and the idea that good design leads to good learning. View the analysis questions below that are referenced in the video.

Dark blue icon of a document with horizontal lines and a magnifying glass positioned over it, symbolizing research, review, or analysis

Video Analysis Questions

  • What did they do well?
  • What were some of the growth areas?
  • What would you have done differently if you were helping design these programs and projects?
  • What elements of the 6 R's of Co-production research did you see?

NNA Flashtalk Series: Harmful Algal Blooms

Connecting Educators with Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Research - Research Cruise Outreach, Workshops, and Resources. Learn more about Harmful Algal Blooms here

NNA Flashtalk Series: Ideas for Permafrost and Snow Teaching

Engaging Youth to Explore Snow and Permafrost in an Arctic Village. Speakers: Jana Peirce & Anja Kade, Ph.D. This video is part of the NNA Community Office Flashtalk series. Learn more about Ideas for Permafrost and Snow Teaching here

NNA Flashtalk Series: Permafrost Gateway

Announcing the Permafrost Discovery Gateway: A new resource for scientists, teachers and anyone interested in big permafrost data in the Arctic. Speakers: Jen Moss & Anna Liljedahl. This video is part of the NNA Community Office Flashtalk series. Learn more about Permafrost gateway teacher RET here or contact jlmoss@alaska.edu.
 

NNA Flashtalk Series: Fresh Eyes on Ice

Observe river and lake ice with your students to contribute to winter travel safety and climate change research. This video is part of the NNA Community Office Flashtalk series. Learn more about Fresh Eyes on Ice here.

Now it’s your turn. Bring it into your classroom!

Ready to build your own backwards design? Use this template to get started!

Read More

Alaska Native Knowledge Network. (1998). Alaska standards for culturally responsive schools. Adopted by the Assembly of Alaska Native Educators, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

Lie, K. (2003). Sámi heritage language program models: Balancing Indigenous traditions and Western ideologies within the Norwegian educational system. Scandinavian Studies, 75(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5406/scanstud.75.2.0273

Lewthwaite, B. (2007). From school in community to a community-based school: The influence of an Aboriginal principal on culture-based school development. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 64. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/42794

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.

Keskitalo, P., Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2012). Sámi education in Finland. Early Child Development and Care, 182(3–4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2011.646718

Anderson, C., Chase, M., Johnson III, J., Mekiana, D., McIntyre, D., Ruerup, A., & Kerr, S. (2012). It is only new because it has been missing for so long: Indigenous evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012449371

Kortekangas, O. (2017). Useful citizens, useful citizenship: Cultural contexts of Sámi education in early twentieth-century Norway, Sweden and Finland. Paedagogica Historica, 53(1–2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2016.1266202

UArctic Thematic Network Members. (2017). Position statement on Arctic pedagogy. Rovaniemi, Iceland.

Topkok, S. A. (2018). Supporting Iñupiaq arts and education. Journal of Folklore and Education, 5(1), 100–111. https://www.journaloffolkloreandeducation.org/supporting-inupiaq-arts-and-education/

Malo-Juvera, V., Correl, P., & Cantrell, S. (2018). A mixed methods investigation of teachers’ self-efficacy for culturally responsive instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.001

Preston, J. P. (2016). Situating educational issues in Nunavut: Perceptions of school leaders and teachers. Northern Review, 42, 109–129. https://thenorthernreview.ca/index.php/nr/article/view/537

Stevenson, B. (2014). How much culture is enough? Inuit teachers’ perceptions of the state of Inuit culture in Nunavik classrooms. Intercultural Education, 25(6), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.990230

Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2015). The basics of Arctic pedagogy. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 15(4). https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume15/2-The-Basics-of-Arctic-Pedagogy.pdf

Waterman-Evans, L. (2023). Arctic pedagogy. Education in the North, 30(2), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.26203/p47e-7k61

Darling-McQuistan, K., Ekberg, N., Snow, K., Alerby, E., Curtis, L., & Jannok-Nutti, Y. (2023). Arctic teacher education and educator training: A postcolonial review of online approaches and practices. Education in the North, 30(2), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.26203/q3t6-z451

Yua, E., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R. A., & Behe, C. (2022). A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12960-27013

Illustration of two people high-fiving in a work environment

Get involved and stay up-to-date with CIRES CEEE.